The use of concepts of discontinuity, rupture, threshold, limit, series, and transformation present all historical analysis not only with questions of procedure, but with theoretical problems. It is these problems that will be studied here (the questions of procedure will be examined in later empirical studies - if the opportunity, the desire, and the courage to undertake them do not desert me). These theoretical problems too will be examined only in a particular field: in those disciplines - so unsure of their frontiers, and so vague in content - that we call the history of ideas, or of thought, or of science, or of knowledge... We must also question those divisions or groupings with which we have become so familiar. Can one accept, as such, the distinction between the major types of discourse, or that between such forms or genres as science, literature, philosophy, religion, history, fiction, etc., and which tend to create certain great historical individualities?
(some text from The Archaeology of Knowledge, 1969) [read more]
อ่าน 3 บทแรกของ AK ได้ที่นี่
(some text from The Archaeology of Knowledge, 1969) [read more]
อ่าน 3 บทแรกของ AK ได้ที่นี่
No comments:
Post a Comment